|
|
|
"I find someone like [James] Joyce quite rock 'n' roll, because he was bending and messing with words." -- Bono |
|||
![]() |
||
Green Eggs and Hank
@U2,
August 23, 2003
Hank Bordowitz has thought long and hard about this question: "If U2 were a book, which book would they be?"
Blame Creedence Clearwater Revival. Bordowitz, the man behind The U2 Reader: A Quarter Century of Commentary, Criticism and Reviews, also gave the world Bad Moon Rising: The Unauthorized History of Creedence Clearwater Revival. As he was working on the latter, a fellow music journalist told him such a book could become "the rock and roll version of Bleak House." So if John Fogerty and Co.'s dealings conjure comparisons to a Dickens novel (one about a lawsuit that drags on until everyone associated with it is dead), what work of literature does U2 call to mind, Hank? "The Fountainhead. It has to do with success by sheer force of will." A collective will to succeed does bleed through the 300 pages of The U2 Reader. Something had to take the band from winning a trophy in Limerick to performing at the Super Bowl. Still, sheer ambition only explains a portion of the band's Story So Far. Anyone attempting to compile a good retrospective needs to give fair, representative time to all the key themes of the past twenty-five years. No, more than that -- he needs to give all themes equal time and to present them in some coherent fashion and to be entertaining, not just erudite and not to run on too long. "Understand this book has been cut and re-cut and restructured quite a bit," Bordowitz says. One major rehaul came near the end of the nine months he spent bringing it into the world. His publishing company (Hal Leonard, the sheet music people) told him one Friday he needed to chop out 100 pages by that Monday. Unfortunately Bordowitz was camping that weekend. Fortunately he had a Palm Pilot. He loaded the manuscript into it and got the proper changes in by the deadline. The final cut includes contributions by Bill Flanagan, Ann Powers, Dave Marsh, Salman Rushdie and Moby. Nothing from Rolling Stone, NME or Hot Press appears -- "They have their own books." (A shame, especially since few outside Ireland know Hot Press. They've put some of the best insights into U2 into print.) Bordowitz sifted through a couple thousand articles all told while researching the book -- he pulled up the band's name on the Lexis/Nexis database; he spent hours in the researcher heaven that is the Lincoln Center Library for the Performing Arts in New York ("They have articles on [first rock and roll DJ] Alan Freed on original newsprint! It's just astounding what they've got!"). He sought pieces where "the theme of the story was something of more than passing interest"; he also looked for names of writers he knew and admired. Then he hoped to get permission to reprint what he found. One aid in his quest: he has spent the past quarter century writing about music (which, as William S. Burroughs remarked, is like "dancing about architecture" -- the name of Bordowitz's newsletter). He knows folks who used to write for Trouser Press; he used to write for Bill Flanagan. He could talk old friends like Robert Christgau into participating -- even if the publishers offered little to have articles reprinted. When told how much the stipend would be, Christgau told Bordowitz, "How could I turn down 25 smackers?" Bordowitz knew from the beginning he would not present his material in a straight chronology. Instead, he wished to group articles by theme. "'Spirituality' and 'Politics' [were] a given." He had pieces written by Billy Corgan and Bruce Hornsby; these anchor a section called "Among Peers." Profiles of Paul McGuinness provide glimpses into "The Business of U2" -- a natural topic for the compiler to highlight, as he teaches an Introduction to the Music Business course at Baruch College. He even slipped in a "Rock Hunks" chapter, inspired in part by stints editing teenybopper magazines. "Part of U2's durability undoubtedly comes from their stint as rock poster boys," the first sentence notes, and then clips from ROCK!, Seventeen, and Star Hits bolster the argument. (Star Hits' summation in 1987 of Bono's childhood includes this memorable line: "He also formed a collection of friends who lived in a secret imaginary place called Lypton Village...") Commentary on U2's music itself does follow rough chronological form. Further discussion appears in chapters "On the Road" and "On the Record," presenting the tours and the albums respectively. Given that U2 made their reputation live, "On the Road" seems abbreviated; The U2 Reader skips both Lovetown and PopMart in this section. Even Zoo TV warrants but a quick blurb about a Paris date. "Would that there were no constraints whilst writing a book," Bordowitz says now. "There were initially articles about each concert [tour]. Some didn't make the cut. Some had to be pulled because of rights issues." He was particularly intrigued by an article all about the lighting at U2 shows, but it was "way too technical. If I hadn't cut it my editor would have." If the book strikes its readers as lead-singer-centric, Bordowitz says he couldn't help it. "The band seems way too comfortable letting Bono being the mouthpiece." He wanted to find a Larry interview from a magazine like Modern Drummer, but couldn't. The target audience for The U2 Reader knows that Larry rarely does interviews. The target audience in fact probably has read many of the pieces in this book -- either in the original publications or in an online archive. So what does Bordowitz hope to achieve by selecting 70-odd articles out of the thousands available and putting them into a book? "I hope [readers] get a fuller picture...I think of U2 as like this crystal and my approach was to shine a light through a couple of facets. I felt...if somebody actually took the time to read the book as a whole, it would give them a well rounded picture -- what they are about and why they are about it. I'm a journalist, I'm out to answer Who, What, Where, When, Why and How." What are they about, then? Why are they about it? "Bring it down to the one word: dedication. These guys are dedicated to each other, dedicated to their art. When they get involved in causes they don't do them half-assed. A lot of society could learn a lot from them right now." Bordowitz also amends his book metaphor, hoping as he does so that everyone understands he regards Dr. Seuss as literature. He mentions that as he looked over articles from the whole 25-year span, he found "surprisingly few contradictions" in how they have presented themselves over time. In their consistency from their early days to the present, "They're like Horton the Elephant -- they meant what they said and they said what they meant. That's certainly more my taste in reading!" From his educated-outsider stance, he says there still may be worlds left for U2 to conquer. "At this point survival is a noble cause. Like the couple that's been married 25 years -- at their silver wedding anniversary [you say] 'God bless'em.' But there's more to it actually than just hanging in there. There's still having an interesting story to tell. They showed with All That You Can't Leave Behind that they've still got a couple of interesting stories to tell." After all this studying of U2's career, has Bordowitz come up with any advice he'd like to give to the band? "I wouldn't even presume! They've befuddled me -- they've confounded me for way too long to even presume to give them advice. I'd sooner take advice from them." He adopts a heavier New York accent as he imagines what he would say: "Tell me something to do here. I'm all ears, baby!" © @U2/Pancella, 2003.
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||